Religious rants

My question is, since you really want to get into it... Why didn't Noah bring any dinosaurs on the ark(Not to mention the food issue, the amount of weight on that boat and of course, the inevitable inbreeding of EVERY species? Oh, and how did plant life survive after being flooded for so long?) I mean, you believe in a young earth, right? Correct me if I'm wrong, but I am curious about what you think. Also, did you know there's fossil evidence that earth was once covered with giant mushrooms? That's a fun (Let's a go!!) one to look into and ask questions about, too.

Here's at least 4 articles that counter that guy's theories. http://www.csun.edu/~vcgeo005/creation.html I read the first one and it gets saucy, lol.

Animals inbreed all the time, the son would get the mother pregnant so on and so forth. Also who said that all the animals of that time were all the animals present today? See while i dont believe humanity evolved from a bunch of monkeys. I believe some form of evolution exists, because how else would explain geological traits. 40 days and 40 nights isnt a long time, while it may seem like alot think about how slavers after conquering a civilization overseas would bring not only slaves, but goods and soldiers plus enough food to last them months long journeys. As for plants lets not forget lichens and how those come about. There is a scientific and historical explanation for everything. But they didnt necessarily need to state everything that went into the creating the ark. I mean what about noah and his fsmily what did they eat? People always wanna get technical well lets talk about that.

Ok so on the topic of inbreeding, indeed animals do inbreed every now and then but not all the time, most genetic disorders appear after a few generations unless they draw the unlucky straw in lottery. Here's the thing though, if all animals within an species descend from the same common direct exemplar, in this case two since two are needed for procreation, they will carry copies of both sides genetic code, including the negative traits, eventually the populations would become so sick that they would naturally die or miscarriage leading to their extinction, this is why certain controlled small populations of animals are so difficult to keep from going extinct, because there's a clear understanding of how screwed they would eventually get genetically. Now, this doesn't happens when animals descend from a common mutated ancestor, for example humans descending from primate's, because several types of mutations took place over time in different places plus migration, it allowed for a clear diversity in the genetic pool, which, mind you, is starting to grow thin nowadays. If you want more examples of inbreeding check sources like the Habsburgs, or the Island of England and how their generational isolationism lead to s clear constrain in their gene pool despite the middle ages constant injection of foreigners due to raids and invasions

Also before anything, no, a species cannot mutate fast enough to outlive generational incest driven genetic flaws, they would certainly go extinct before any even got the chance to become a separate species.

Sooo... Is that a yes or no on the dinosaurs? Side note... Humans didn't come from monkeys, we're part of the great apes. It's called an evolutionary tree, we come from a particular branch that is linked to whatever all apes came from. We literally have DNA in us from multiple variations in our family tree, like neanderthal. We can prove this, too. No "It's demons!" or "Nephilim!!!!!" either.

Yeah, it is why I went with primate's rather than monkeys, regular monkeys just don't cut it even in the great scale of evolution