ATTN: Fellow Weebs

@Jamesu: No choco-chips for you guys. Never readin mah posts... https://media1.tenor.com/images/6745142941ba215479b3f61235e6f418/tenor.gif

I mean... Niggard is used in Shakespeare, just means stingy. Stingy it is.

Oh man, this whole discussion on the last few pages reminds me of this: http://youtu.be/9uvJzr0zZvk

As far as I know (granted that isn't a scholarly level of knowledge) the black community is pretty split (or at minimum not united) on the "acceptability" of the N word (I'll be nice and not say it but we all know which word I refer to). Honestly if the black community expects other races (particularly whites) to accept a certain limitation or viewpoint as social law which cannot even be challenged or questioned (Like we can't even get a solid thought out "why" but to accept it "just because") then it should at least be a super majority (if not damn near unanimous) in agreement but as far as I and most of society can tell this is not the case. Some say that word is okay under no circumstances ever (regardless of race or any other circumstance) Some say that word is okay just between black people with the "ga" variation Some say that word is okay between blacks and those "black enough" (other races who by at least one member of the black community are deemed acceptable to use the word without being viewed negatively) Some say that word is camaraderie between blacks (and sometimes other minorities) Some say that word is purely a symbol and relic of hate and oppression I could go on and on but my point is there is not one unanimously or super-majority definition or circumstance that can be clearly defined and widely agreed upon. How can a condition be imposed that cannot even be questioned or explained without being labeled a hardcore racist if the oppressed community cannot even come together and agree on a philosophy? In other words the black community should get their own house in order on this issue before addressing it with the rest of society. Like how can society as a whole be expected to be bound by such rules when the oppressed community cannot even agree on the level of offense. If the black community cannot come together on this issue how are the rest of us expected to "or else"? If it is truly the will of the black community then should it not be easily the majority viewpoint. Whatever the "rules" are with that word even if we are to abide by it due to social pressure or legal consequence the least the rest of us should have access to are the "rules" and "why".

You know what, fuck it and fuck all of you. A bunch of white people bitching about a word they can't say in real life, or at least to my face in real life. Y'all might as well keep saying it to yourselves. It's your only vent. Bunch of closet bigots. Enjoy https://youtu.be/5FjWe31S_0g

This thread :P https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xdyin6uipy4

I don't for my part(Tis the season, Tralalala) . I wasn't being racist, buuuut...Ya know, fuck it.

A bunch of white people bitching and criticizing arbitrary demands, arbitrary "rules", one person speaking for a whole populace of people, centered around a word which has a great deal of negative history* (fixed it) We're bitching more about the execution of your ideals than the ideal itself - big difference. This thread was started for anything offensive but I mean someone just hhhhaaaaaaaddddd to make it about racism against black people specifically (which granted does fit under the umbrella of the thread). White people having a view different than a black man - the answer is obviously systemic racism there simply is no other reason that would be impossible. I mean we can't possibly be doing this for any other reason but skin color (not presentation or methodology of information or lack of). An alarm clearly went off and all of us white guys went RACIST FRIENDS ASSSEMMMMMMBBBBLLLLEEEEEEEEEEEE (bring the whips and torches!) Kiddo- hes an agitator which is a distant cousin of the troll. Instead of engaging in nonsense "for the lols" an agitator will engage in shitty discourse to either vent out their own anger over an issue or to incite anger over an issue (or both). To an agitator there is only one correct opinion and all other viewpoints are subject to moral (but usually not logical) vilification