https://i.imgur.com/wKTD4Q9.gif also @Midas that homemade pizza looks delish :o

I think the majority of people intelligent enough to discuss controversial issues with a level head in consideration of the facts, also recognize the risk of the damage to their own character that will incur from those who are unreasonable. On the flip side, those who are intelligent enough who DO engage in controversial discussion also feel they must be bold enough to crush any effort to undermine their character. These people are likely going to be less patient as a response, so they can better snuff out anything that is not true, and get immediately to the heart of the matter before people watching the discussion have time to be tricked. What's left as a result is chaos, and you have a hard time having legitimate discussion with people you disagree with. The rest of those who are unintelligent don't know how to respond in a way that will convince anyone of their viewpoint, because they don't know how to convince themselves of their own viewpoint. They rely on adhering to a viewpoint simply for the sake of it, rather than coming to a natural conclusion. The only tactics they have left are repeating arguments others have made, or finding a dirtier way to win. At the same time, someone who actually is intelligent can point out inconsistent logic, and that itself can be seen as an attack on someone's character, though it's more about attacking the logic rather than the person, it unfortunately is inherent to that person.