In my opinion, a society cannot be both equal and free. Your thoughts?
I think generally speaking, you're right. Even if we got rid of the issue of resources (via a Star Trek-like replication system or something) there will still be an urge in some people to rebel against a system imposed on them without their consent, which will lead to conflict.
I generally lean more toward an "equal" society, but with enough caveats to allow for individuality and dissenting voices. Japan is a very rigid, "equal" society; but there is also a lot of societal pressure that makes people feel completely outcast just for disagreeing with commonly held "norms."
I've often maintained that a fictional country that sits somewhere in between the American extreme of too many freedoms, and the Japanese extreme of too many constraints, is where I want to live.
need better context
if its paradise doesnt this assume im happy while unfree?
if so then sure, ill take paradise
You need to go into further detail.
Unequal and free. 'Tis better to live like a lion for day than 100 years as a sheep.
Unequal in Paradise.
I don't think that would be paradise.
I am having a hard time understanding the meaning of the topic and some context would be really helpful. The only thing I can think of when you say unequal in paradise would be something like the world of Psycho-Pass in which a persons individuality and freedom is lost and society dictates who you are and what job you can do but on the flip-side the society is relatively peaceful. If it is something like that then hell no I do not want it at all. I can't comment on unequal and in pain though because I can't think of a possible example to draw from.