Religious rants

"Published in 1611, the King James Bible spread quickly throughout Europe. Because of the wealth of resources devoted to the project, it was the most faithful and scholarly translation to date—not to mention the most accessible." While i dont necessarily know if its the most accurate, i own both the KJV and the ESV with footnotes and they are both vastly different. I own the macarthur study bible which on each page has verse by verse breakdowns of what each thing means. Im reading 2 bibles a week literally and watching prayer and studies in my free time.

Interesting book read from a past believeer, "A case for Christ" and "A case for Creation.". Just thought I'd add those.

I asked if Muslims would burn in hell. And you said, “No jesus no salvation. Its that simple.” Ding! Ding! Ding! 10 points to Gryffindor! See, was that so hard? I know you think I’m wasting your time. But don’t worry. I’m bringing out those CHAD Christian beliefs out to the surface. Oh and BTW, you didn’t break anything down Pandus. You simply went on some weird tangent about America. Huh, Ok? Lol Pandus before the roasting: “I never said anyone was burning in hell for being catholic.” Pandus after the roasting “I didn’t say all catholics would be saved” Nice simmer on that steak. Not saved equates to hell. I guess some Catholics are burning in hell after all.

That wasnt me saying anyone was going to hell, saying no jesus no salvation doesnt bar anyone from finding jesus. Ur reaching my guy. I said what i said not what you said. Ur really grasping for straw here lmfaooo i didnt say all catholics were going to hell which i didnt and i also didnt say all catholics were saved which i didnt. I thought your rebuttal would have been strong af, but i guess this is just what im dealing with here. I overestimated you lol

@chise8686 “A TRUE Christian were taught to love and to accept them for who and what they are. God doesn't hate them, he loves them all. <3” That’s cute that you think that, but that is completely and utterly unbiblical. Let’s us quoteth thy lord. Blessed be thy words! God hates people with tattoos. “You shall not make any cuts on your body for the dead or tattoo yourselves: I am the LORD.” (Leviticus 19:28) God hates bastards. “A bastard shall not enter into the congregation of the Lord; even to his tenth generation shall he not enter into the congregation of the Lord.” (Deuteronomy 23:2) God hates homosexuals “If a man practices homosexuality, having sex with another man as with a woman, both men have committed a detestable act. They must both be put to death, for they are guilty of a capital offense.” (Leviticus 20:13) I can go on and on. These are “things that God has revealed to us as truths.” I TRUE Christian is one that follows God’s commands. None of this new age let’s love everyone kumbaya misinterpreted Christian dogma. Which is wholly unbiblical. Don’t take it up with me. Take it up with God. But if you ask me. I’m personally more of a fan of GigaCHAD God wiping out cities xD

Yeah yeah yeah, we hear it all the time from the trans community. God is so divisive, Christianity is full of hate. It doesnt move me, it doesnt move us, the truth is only offensive to those who live in lies.

You logically take one step forward and two steps back. Hell and heaven is after death you donkey. If it wasn't obvious. I was talking about what happens to certain people with certain beliefs after death. What if they held false evil catholic beliefs till they died? Then what? One last thing. You know, only Noah and his family survived the flood. Which means that there was a lot of incest fucking after the flood Lol

No point in fighting from either side. Ironic that I'm saying this... Buuuuut... Live and let live. Shit slinging just leaves everyone smelling like shit. I feel like it's becoming (If it was ever anything else.) a battle of egos. It's hard to spread a message when feelings get hurt and it's hard to discuss when egos get involved. It's starting to just sound like "Who can come across more smug?". Although, I am curious about the inbreeding aspect, now that that's been brought up. I suspect there's no real answer to that. I remember one bible study class where the dude teaching just said "Maybe DNA was less corrupt?". I'm not to sure on that one.lol The bible is against incest, ironically. Sooooo... I don't get that part either. I mean, mankind was inbred from the start going by the bible and then doubly so after the flood.

I mean hasnt it always been that way? Adam and Eve and their children all the way until Noah. You do realize incest was really common even throughout the royal families. The only issue is it caused genetic defects. Also if they held false and evil catholic beliefs then God will judge them according to his word. Same way homosexuality is seen as an abomination, God will do as he sees fit. Im not ssying they are gonna go to hell, for I am not the most high.