Political rants

The last woman I was with was rather compact and I knew ahead of time her previous history so I'm willing to believe it is up to more than simple use to decide that feature.

Would need a more in depth poll to determine that one. Though I didn't feel like anything improper happened my first time lol.... I went into the situation expecting it hurt, but not knowing how much, and knowing there could be blood. And thats about as much as anyone can prepare themselves for that event being a biological woman. When people say "oh it won't hurt if you do it right," well thats insulting. And its misinformation. Theres too many unknowns. For example, men vary in size, so do women.

Opening, depth, some women have particular bumps on the inside. One of my friends in college used to get drunk and cry about how he missed his ex just because she had a bump in her's that hit his head just right, lol. I used to fuck with him and ask if he thought it might have been a tumor.

Um "poping the cherry" literally means "My vagina bleeds the first time someone inserts a dick or dildo into it it ow it is gonna hurt" so I assume that is shrouded in some truth... ... ... ...right?? :/

@projectotakux as a fellow virgin that whole sentence made me wince, but I am sure that it means that lol just slang for breaking the hymen lolol

i think its silly to admonish affirmative action when these people have historically been denied places of power for the sole justification of racist ideologies is it ideal? absolutely not. someone being denied something purely because of their ethnicity is always going to be wrong, but alternatively, someone that has likely had less options because of things like jim crow and the crime bill that has hindered their family's accumulative wealth (i.e practices like redlining) and parental structure (i.e fathers being carted off to jail and leaving a child to be raised in a single-parent household) why is it innately wrong that biden is purposefully seeking a woman of color to become the new supreme court justice when historical racism is the reason why there has never been one? and even from a utilitarian standpoint, its good to have a wide demographic in the courts, because life experience tends to vary by demographic, and varied perspectives on a situation can cast a wider lens on certain issues

That's a critique I have of Liberal States (despite me being rather favourable to them), they promote equality in their constitutions, when the only possible path to this eschatological equality is the destruction of the public debate by certain groups of people's constant bitching because they want reparations. Blacks deserve reparations? Of course, they were enslaved and their liberties taken due to actual racism and how the market worked at the time. But throwing them into positions of power due to self-loathing is just bullshit. But women don't deserve reparations. They deserve rights, of course, but no reparations. They weren't enslaved. Unlike slavery, women's submission was a natural thing in pre-feminist world literally everywhere. Nothing to do with ideology, nothing to do with abnormal/immoral socio-economical conditions, like slavery was. Besides, what good to administration would do affirmative action in itself? I am not asking for examples, I am asking cause and effect. Because certain groups have more sensibility to their actual problems? Sure, that's right. But what else? Eventually, people ask for more, and they will never get satisfied.