Why women should take risks and responsibility

^Which was the point of me asking the question... there isn't any shouting. Making the accusation that there's all this shouting and unfair treatment towards the OP (who STARTED the slander) makes as much sense as a person that makes a blatant mockery of a user, who made literally zero slanderous comments towards anyone else, is now trying to be a voice of reason in this thread about how other people should be more respectful. xD

Who said it was a discussion? It was a joke. Some people found it funny like I expected. Others probably didn't but didn't lose their shit over it, Jesus Christ. You're nitpicking simply to have something to get angry about. I don't even care you win man. -_- You're obviously the most righteous. Now please stop shouting.

^Great point you made for your actions, buddy. edit: bro, you can't delete your post and replace it with an attempt at being more rational, because it now presents my comment out of context! edit (to sound more rational): That's just me joking btw. It's ok though, because I was joking and I'm sure some people found it funny. Y'know, just like how some people found the jokes in this thread funny. The difference, buddy, is that you're being a hypocrite with no valid justification, which is why you resorted to your edited comment. edit (to sound more rational-er): My comment about "discussion" was to just point out that you make a joke that isn't a discussion, and it's ok, because it's a joke... but I make a joke that isn't a discussion, and you criticize me because I didn't add to the OP's discussion. See the contradiction there? edit (to sound more rational-ist): And btw, I found your edited pic and pussy magnet to be funny. My only point, which I bet you understand, is that since you did that, you now don't get to tell others how to be respectful towards others.

Nah I'm good. I'll just let you revel in the glory.

When someone realizes they have no valid points to something they initially brought up, their only choice afterwards is to pretend they never really cared...

I still think you've been over reacting since the very beginning. You've talked a lot and try to shame me for using a bit of dark humor, but I still stand by what I said. If you feel like you win the second someone is unwilling to listen to you prattle on then fair enough. I care very much.

"That’s just not how that works. Because 1: This is already in the works and still not doing anything. And 2. If anything, according to MO what happens when someone gets into a fucked up relationship or gets rejected to many times? They fucking give up and lose interest. So if women “get more relationships” which fail cause they were so hasty and aggressive…What do you think will happen." I never said that they should be hasty or rush into none functioning relationships. This is the test of wills and if men can go and be rejected a thousand times why can't a women? Are you saying that only men can seek the right person out of quality or that they are infinitely better than women? Well, I'll stop there and answer that because I don't think you or I think that's the case. We both know that there will be stresses involved but I think it's possible for women to take on the role of searching for both relationships and other aspects of their life. If men can do it why not a lady. This is also not a straw man on my end as I discarded the idea of you or I wanting or thinking that women are incapable of what a male does in terms of dealing with stress from failed relationships. "Its not fixing any dating problems." No, this will not fix every dating problem or issue in mankind but it's a step in the right direction and if women truly want equality they will need to experience and engage more. This is not wrong as you need to put your self out there and try to grow as a person and the more you do the better. As long as you do things right and actually learn from these things. To say that it won't fix dating problems and say that it's incorrect means I'm left with the idea that you think that no problems in dating can be fixed from engaging more and being more confident? You can't be so sure to be so flat on that as it's just not logical. "If you wanted to date those few women. Few being a generous word there. You also should have said something instead of waiting for her to say something. And if you yourself weren’t really interested in the first place and just “Wouldn’t have said no if she would of asked” then you had no business dating her to begin with cause you didn’t even like her. So it all works out. It would be helpful to have both sex's take part in the filtering and search of compatible mates. Already happens." I never said that I wanted to date any women of those women and I don't know why you think I just wait about for them? I never said that I did so yet again you got the gold straw man award! If you read it you would understand that these parties didn't tell me and so I didn't know because I'm not a mind reader and can telepathically read the peoples minds across the city. Now I'm a far person I would have given them a chance and it most likely would have just been a date but I'm not sure. I can't look into the what if ball and see what could have been. The filtering of mates is trash right now and it's a limited number of women that as active on the same level as men. However, I think that it has improved a bit but not as much as it could be due to different variables. "This is pretty much his cop-out in case shit doesn’t go well. “W-Well I said this but I never said that it would actually work!” AKA you pretty much gave permission for me to not even read anything in the first place, you aren’t even trying to stand by what you said. Top of that, again he is only writing all of this based on people he has seen personally in his personal little world instead of using actual research and what not, in other words more permission for me to disregard and not read stuff." The first half of your argument is an abusive ad hominem. You're also stacking more straw man crap on top of the abusive ad hominem. You miss quoted me and putting words in my mouth without clearly stating that it's your words. You are trying to use some of my abrasive characteristics to damage my view. You also attacked my viewpoint by suggesting earlier on that I had something to gain by making women more outgoing. As in this direct quote from you "The main issue in your whole argument is that…You aren’t a women, and thus it seems because of that you have no sympathy, empathy or even a willingness to understand why anyone does what they do. (men or women I am guessing, with that attitude) The mood of your posts suggest women are not even human. Just a convenience that wound up inconveniencing you. You keep comparing them to machines for some reason. The general topic suggests that despite what you are trying to advocate, you wanna sit on your ass like a women and get chased. That’s what the goal is. “Hey chase me sometimes too.” " This is attacking my position as a male and in turn viewpoint by suggesting that I am posting this to merely obtain benefits from a change like this. You're basing this off of my position. This attack on my position has no bearing on whether my points are valid or not. This circumstantial ad hominem is not the right manner to which conduct a proper dispute of any ideas.