Do Not Enter

also i take offense that i only shit on conservatives I'm an equal-shitting-on-dumbases-opportunist, ok https://i.imgur.com/2PjZToK.jpg

He threw multiple items according to what I've read. Apparently it was a molotv off camera. Either way. Even if it wasn't. Why persue someone with a gun and begin throwing unidentified objects at them? The sexual predator couldve easily disengaged. I don't care all that much anyways about why he did it. I wouldn't shed a single tear for a sexual predator

wheres your proof? because witnesses from the scene say there was no Molotov and there is still no evidence of there one being there i could put the same spin on it that you are why did that murderer cross statelines with a gun if not to kill people? and people died didn't they? isnt it only logical to say that that murderer wanted to kill? your really saying the murder victim shouldn't have insigated the murder bruh maybe the murderer shouldn't have crossed state lines with a gun seems like the more logical statement my man

I'm not saying he shouldn't be arrested. Hell I'm not defending him at all. He broke the law. I'm making the argument that these "victims" are not innocent either, and they shouldn't be depicted as such. One is a sexual predator, who assaulted a fleeing man with a gun (molotv or not), another assaulted an attempting fleeing man with a gun, and another violated Geneva conventions, and attempted to draw his own gun on a man attempting to flee with a gun. It's not like these idiots were just standing there, minding their own business and randomly some psycho ran up and mowed them down

your giving him a moral defense one was a sex offender and the other was a fucking murderer and what about the other person he murdered? just because he had a gun ON HIM AND NOT DRAWN? are you a fan of the NRA? do you not believe that a person who owns a gun should not be killed simply because he owns one? the fact that he owned a gun and still tried to peacefully apprehend the shooter i say gives the man a lot of credit and he did not have a Molotov cocktail you are lying when you insinuate he may or may not have had one he did not and to say he "may have" when there is no proof is lying and the fact that you HAVE to keep bringing it up shows your own insecurity in the validity of the mans death the man was unarmed and reports say KYLE was the insigator yet your implying the death of two people were reasonable because, why? one was a sex offender and the other had a gun on his person? so they deserved to die? the world you live in is not one id like to be apart of

life would be more fun if some random psycho would have mowed them down. (and gotten away) just so people are like "what the fuck" and "not like this.."

easy to say until your loved ones or you yourself is the one dying that has the others saying 'not like this' America should be bolstering protests as that is our FIRST amendment right, not trying to snuff them out by police harassment and having citizens act as judge, jury, and executioner that shits authoritarian and i thought Americans hated that shit as much as they hated commies

You have such a way of skewing words and leaving things out. DO NOT TRY TO ASSAULT SOMEONE WITH A GUN, IF YOU DO, DONT BE SUPRISED IF YOU GET SHOT. The third guy HAD HIS GUN DRAWN. The second guy tried taking a rifle AT THE END OF THE BARREL after fucking assaulting the guy with a gun during a live shooting. The sexual predator was hurling objects at a fleeing man with a gun when he could've instead chose to disengage. I'm not at all saying kyle should've even been there in the first place. But I don't feel bad about a sexual predator being shot, even if it was just a matter of coincidence. These three "victims" ACTIVELY SAUGHT ENGAGEMENT AGAINST AN ARMED PERSON. That is fucking retarded