RACISM

Hecatia, No shit, but this ain't about me. At least I can admit my wrong doings. "Judge not, that ye be not judged. For with what judgment ye judge, ye shall be judged: and with what measure ye mete, it shall be measured to you again. And why beholdest thou the mote that is in thy brother's eye, but considerest not the beam that is in thine own eye? Or how wilt thou say to thy brother, Let me pull out the mote out of thine eye; and, behold, a beam is in thine own eye? Thou hypocrite, first cast out the beam out of thine own eye; and then shalt thou see clearly to cast out the mote out of thy brother's eye." Gonna quote? Quote it all, in context. Regardless, I agree this thread is trash, currently and really, I've seen napalm try a bit more than you. I'm simply saying it's a pointless shit show (currently), where neither side is without wrong doing.

@Too Kawaii Bish (TKB) (p49) Then why not just ignore them and continue on like we are now? How bout it? (p50) You are absolutely correct. But it's not a miscommunication. I called thing 2 a mongrel first a few pages earlier and it had no issues with me saying anything then. No mention of how it was rude or anything {page 22 - 24}. It wasn't until later that me posting my profile pic was racist & the things were attempting to school me with their genius intellect on what & where mongrel is and what not. {pages 28 - 30} I'm suppose to know that a "guy" that uses a Japanese animated chick as its main profile pic who claims that they're taken but on its "info" tab states that it's not in a relationship & swears the reason why there are no pics of it on its page is because of stalkers. On it's page alone, it contradicts itself 3 times. How am I suppose to know what its sex, race, religion or any other useful bits of information. I call it an it because I'm not sure I can call it anything else and be truly honest with myself.

@xFake (p.49) Good luck, brother! (p.50) <---i'm being so professional & I dunno why (a) They want more of a reaction out of me and are still trying to get under my skin. Or, at least, that's what I gathered from all this. You? (b) You're right. The topic did get shifted. And it did with the very first response from king It, itself. And after I responded to it, it continued to go off topic and that leads us to here. I think we all know which post really set off its temper after I responded to it. (c) It can't answer that question without watching the video first, and that would be it pretty much going back on its own word and admitting defeat to me and/or peer pressure. It's not going to watch the video. It's pride is on the line.