An interesting perspective on Michael Jackson

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6pnoQqlygQs If you have the time I ask you to watch the video the whole video and then share your thoughts on it. And I do encourage you to watch the entire thing before posting on this thread. Because the jokes about MJ piss me the fuck off and I finally found someone who could sum up my contention with this joke of an accusation.

For someone who claims to be devoted to "spreading logic, reason, and empirical evidence and deduction" I am seeing a lack of it in this comment. Did you even watch the video and get the facts? Michael Jackson is not a pedophile.

It really doesn't matter to me if he was or wasn't. Though it wouldn't surprise me if he was into that, virtually no child stars get out of Hollywood without scars. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3611046/I-molested-passed-Corey-Feldman-details-horrors-Hollywood-pedophile-ring-reveals-Corey-Haim-just-11-raped-leading-life-drugs.html And statistically, those who suffered from sexual abuse as a child often end up becoming pedophiles themselves. Among other things, like drug addicts especially. Didn't you find it TOO coincidental that SO many child and pre-teen stars go batshit crazy at a point? Regardless though, I do believe there is much more to the story than, "MJ is a pedophile and a drug addict." MUCH more. http://youtu.be/m9Nu9HPzVuk

If you're talking about the vanity fair article, you'd be interested to know that the whole thing was sensationalized. In fact you'd be interested to know that evidence was doctored or outright fabricated in the case(and provably so) by the prosecution in an attempt to get him convicted. I used to think he was guilty. It's easy to just accept it when so many people just assume it's true. But after looking the evidence over I am not convinced he ever molested a child. All "evidence" has already been gone over in extensive detail. And the official documents explicitly state that Jackson did not have child porn in his house. https://www.quora.com/Was-Michael-Jackson-really-a-paedophile http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/no-child-porn-found-at-neverland-thenor-now-the_us_577fdfbce4b0f06648f4a3f8 I'm among the people who don't think he did it. :P

I don't believe he did it either I think one of the reasons why people want to believe so much that he committed this act is because of how sexually ambiguous he seemed as well as not conforming to societies standard of masculinity which may have made him be seen as a deviant in the eyes of people who hold conservative values but unlike Prince, Michael was probably more sensitive and naive which led him to be an easy target for people. but all if this is just my opinion