αleph-01

Aaa pinche raza si c mamaron con esta XD https://i.ani.me/0322/4704/se_mamron_con_esta.jpg

Cute police officer: you better not do dat shit again or I’ll take you to prison and punish you. You got dat big boi? Criminal: Oooh! I’ve been a naughty boi *blushes* XD https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=siIy7kIw7Zc&ab_channel=DazaiW.

Me when I’m fighting a hard ass boss in a game: I shiiet, I done fucked up now! I only pissed him off. Run like a bitch! Run like a bitch! God! I’m sorry sir! I won’t bother you again! Owie Owie Owie, pls don’t beat da shit outta me *DEATH* https://media.giphy.com/media/lNRbem6CEQsz8x64cS/giphy.gif https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5b1562924cde7ad879d8107c/1556125387540-Q5UWRGN0N76ZYNCG7F2P/DisgustingMadGilamonster-size_restricted.gif But when you finally beat it. Your confidence goes way up. Start talking shit Lol. Yeah bish! You fucked with the wrong one today! I'm Alephy! God destroyer! https://media2.giphy.com/media/VtBdwH58SwmymtT96l/giphy.gif

One of the weirdest facts that I have ever learned comes from the conclusion of Russell’s Paradox. Russell’s paradox goes deep into the very foundations of mathematics. To set up the paradox. First start off with U as the collection of all sets. R are sets that are not elements of themselves. If we let any set R in universe U, R is an element of itself if and only if R is not an element of itself. Hence, if R is not an element of R, then R is an element of R. Which is a contradiction. Set R is both an element and not an element of itself. R is both in R and not in R, which is a contradiction. Simplified in normal English. The most famous example of Russell’s paradox goes as follows: “A barber shaves anyone who does not shave himself, and no one else." The question is, does the barber shave himself? -If the barber shaves himself. The barber shaves anyone who do not shave themselves. Barber shaves and does not shave himself. Which is a contradiction. - If the barber does not shave himself. The barber shaves anyone who do not shave themselves. Barber shaves and does not shave himself. Which is a contradiction. The barber is both an element and not an element of himself. Which is Russell’s paradox. One logical workaround the paradox is to say that elements cannot be elements of themselves. Which is exactly the solutions proposed in the axiomatic formulation of Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory. Interesting enough from that formulation. The collection U of all sets does not exist. But the empty set does exist. https://i.ani.me/0322/2810/img_20211125_131717485_hdr_3.jpg

You funny MF. Whomever came up with this is a fuckin CHAD. Set theory humor. I love it https://i.redd.it/ecnonykb5cv51.png