Why are "fat girls" like me so unattractive??

A piece of advice, girl to girl. Fuck those guys! Seriously. There shallow assholes. You're perfect just the way you are. Don't change for anyone. And If guys don't like that, they can kiss you're ass. You're pretty. Don't let fuckers like them get you down. :)

wow... that's pretty hostile sounding. I'm just saying what's actually circulating in the psychological community today. *shrug* It's not that I make a pint in disagreeing with you. You just happen to say things that I may or may not agree with and I'll state that if I see it. If you don't want someone to disagree with you, then don't post things out on a public forum where people can do so

Well medically speaking, and feel free to ask a doctor. Women need about I wanna 7-10% body fat to even start menzies, That's why women who are very skinny will probably start it later in life. When they reach that minimum. That's also a medical fact, feel free to find it in an anatomy and phys book. Or take an A&P class. Or as a doctor. If you don't believe all those then... dunno what to say then

It's not personal. I don't make it a habit to randomly go after people I don't know. Especially on the internet, because lord knows I'm too busy to really care. I'm sure you're not the only person I have disagreements with on here. It's really a simple, I read it and I felt like posting a reply.

If you want a physio explaination though, to the body fat needed question. It's because adipocytes synthesize androgens into estrogen. That estriol produced contributes a lot to the overall body's estriol level. So while no, it's not the only factor why there's abnormal menzies and we don't know the exact percentage of fat you need to start, we do know that women with significantly low levels of body fat, like some athletes, have amenorrhea

Lol I'm sure she's stalking you just waiting for you to make and post so she can disagree. Sounds like perfectly good use of time. :D

Xueli, psychiatrists can write scripts, not psychologists also to that other person, Frued had multiple theories but at the end of the day, his writings aren't considered facts as much as they are considered basically theories, or even just schools of thought. Of which in modern psychology and psychiatric practices, there are multiple. And he also was a significant Neurologist, i don't know why Maverick is going crazy but hey, there ya go. His theories are considered to have more weight in psychology than psychiatry, and the nature of what he taught and wrote about in the social sphere implies wholly that his ideas can be considered simply ideas at best, not facts. Psychiatrists are more likely to contribute to study that cements facts, which normally only happens in actual scientific studies when some sort of causaulity is confirmed (for a psychiatric disorder and so on). correlational studies or theories on how humans form socially will be as scientific as political schools of thought - ironically, which is what Freuds teachings are closest to. He was hugely influential but many of his ideas are outdated, and inherently sexist as well.