debate

i dont want someone to just go along with it, but be able to throw points around without running away in the end i want a serious debate im on the side that its unethical to kill animals for consumption unless its hunting with a rifle and you use all the parts

its been awhile since iv had a worthy opponent the only really engaging debate on this topic i had was with wolf-something but he ended up having to rely on "buht animuhls duhnt have sentients" which is provenly false so i just want a mentally engaging debate on the ethics

Unfortunately that topic has proven itself to be somewhat limiting, in that there isn’t a whole lot of middle ground to be had and most people see the issue as being black and white. I think we’ve already seen the textbook responses plus some on both sides.

im not looking for a middle ground, im looking to win =w=

tell me how i was vane >w>? no jumping around the answer. i dont think you know what a strawman is if you think i was strawmaning you. do you think comparing killing a cow to killing a dog is strawmanning? what fallacies have i used? can you name them? when have i adhomed someone in a serious debate? answer these things with real answers and then we'll see whos the one whos pissing in circles :3

you can win a debate thats why debates are a competitive sport one person can have a stronger opinion thats based on more facts than another and be the objective winner seems to show you really dont know much about debating >w>