Political rants

What do i need to study? Women's choice? I need to survey 100 pregnant people at the abortion clinic to ask them if they would be ok with having another option rather than abortion?

If you provide a solution to an argumentation you brought up, you should at least bring in some journals, studies or something that provides your statement. If you just say something and declare it as "solution" it is not a solution. Just keep your hottakes to yourself, your peers, your friends or whoever. With that I am leaving, got stuff to do.

I feel like you just realized i wasnt trying to get rid of abortions and rather than own up to it you keep saying im wrong.

Let me tell you a story about software development. A small group of the company enters a meeting to design a product. 6 hours later they emerge with a 20 page document on exactly how this thing is going to be built. Their ego is INVESTED in this thing. They show it to some others and they point out flaws. They shrug them off. They're gonna build this thing even if it's a flaming pile of turds. Saying you shouldn't get involved until later is still exclusion and preempts and devalues their input.

One article here from a .gov website i shall uunt for more after i visit umi's point https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8334275/

Ok my last take on this: I did never say that you wanted to get rid of abortions. I did critisize your "solution" and brought one study to your attention that proved one of your points as wrong (there are others aswell). That is about it. I never said... "Omg.... you want to get rid of abortions" that is your take you put into that. @Umi, thanks for giving that insight. That is the same thing I wanted to do to Pandas point. Do not provide "soltions" without hearing critiques in this case probably mostly women who want to have their own voices heard about a statement/"solution" a random guy just brought up. @Panda, got it but you did not read the whole post I assume, just the abstract right? Anyways, I need to do some stuff for work, so I head off.

I am open to feedback. Yes i though about how people could exploit that system. I also though about how pouring tax payer dollars into such a controversial topic would set off arguments so i made it nonprofit. Using solely money form the rich. (Lets be honest they would donate if it meant a tax write off) and with the rest of the population being taxed anyway i feel we can afford it as long as we spend that money well. I can also route those resources to infrastructure. Building up communities and such. Back to the abusing the system and pumping out kids. Ofc there would need to be an interview process of some kind. While invasive and would probably shy some away. Its only an additional option for those coerced into abortion but not wanting to do it. This removes any abortion guilt. Because you didnt kill the child and they get the chance to live. While you receive support financially through this you wont have to worry about how youbwill afford Ob appointments or food and stuff being unable to work.