Burning out on Maiotaku.com

@Tbaris As I can respect that you not taking what I said personally and acknowledging my logical points. But, no, I didn't just say you were using more complex terminology to make yourself more smarter and enigmatic off of emotions, but off of the fact you used biology with regards to a topic on mentality in making it seem like our biology in how men are more wired to pursue women is the main factor in deducing why there are so many thirsty users around, with what I read from your info, and how you about always talk in calculations or formulas. So, I more or less was entirely calling out what you said in your message and also by taking a glimpse at your double hidden info in runology where you said people who make their infos easy to read are sheep and think homo sapiens are annoying, when you're the one's who got a whole info written in cipher and think its special due to being more complex. But I didn't say you said made up words or that you're an idiot. Nor was that my point, nor am I gonna go through every single last message you've posted to see how often you mistake biology as psychology. I see bullshit, I call out bullshit. Nothing personal. You're pretentious, but definitely smart. Very smart. And I don't dislike you at all. And there's a difference between a making an assumption that lacks data and making an assumption that has incorrect data. Cause I just didn't wanna make an even longer message backing why I think you're pretentious when I doubted you'd even see it, but it was an assumption all the same, so that is my bad. But I guess I gave my data on that in this message.

Not that I would probably be likely to accept any- at the moment, I would probably either reject or leave them hanging for a while- but I have no problem whatsoever with the "over 10 friends in two weeks" because I haven't received any friend requests myself. XD Although I suppose that says something about me as a person.........

@judgmenoftherain I still entirely disagree. I agree that it's good that people who are wise and know better should have an opportunity to help people who need it and don't know any better. But I don't see the point in making an entire optional algorithm to slow down traffic, when users could do that themselves and change so that they have a healthy enough self-esteem to not stress over messages from people they don't even really know. A lot of users learn better when encountering certain circumstances, and others don't...installing an optional algorithm to counteract such occurrences altogether would discourage users who feel overwhelmed by the many people they're messaging from coping with it, give them a way out, and they wouldn't learn a thing. I again absolutely agree that the wise have an opportunity to help those less experienced from certain situations, but not when it keeps them from having the opportunity to becoming healthier, better people from learning themselves. Have a algorithm like that would help others to NOT be better and learn from mistakes they make, and some might really use that system as a way out....and when there are no consequences for an action like that and if they grow use to that system, they'll grow to become naive and potentially even carry that on through their daily life, struggling to make rational decisions if they were to feel overwhelmed in a similar situation in reality, because they've grown use to the system here and they still don't have the self-esteem to just not talk to that many people to begin with or are willing to ignore some people. I'd take obstacles, seeing people grow into better people from it, and helping as many I find along the way every time over a system that doesn't trust its users to learn, so it instead tries to minimize it and discourage others from confronting such obstacles to grow as a person. Thirsty guys with no respect or care should be handled just as every person in reality does....by ignoring and discarding them. That's another problem. Distinguishing between a person just screwing around, a person complimenting them, a normal person just trying to make conversation, and a person who wants to get in the others pants. The rules and guidelines would get abused and be a complicated mess even for a bigger, organized, and complicated site/organization to maintain. Would it be up to the user whose defined as thirsty? What would be defined as thirsty? What's the difference between a compliment and being thirsty? People would be too scared to even say someone else is nice without a user being labeled as thirsty and put into some blacklist category. It's too complicated, takes away too much freedom, discourages people from confronting a problem they made themselves despite how they would greatly improve from overcoming it, and is unrealistic in its implementation, in regards to society, and morally. It is the individual's responsibility and freedom on how many people they talk to, how many they continue to talk to, who they choose to ignore or be disgusted by, and how to confront problems from them talking to too many people. Having voluntary traffic control is in no way a step forward or something that will benefit the user in the long-run and in their daily lives in society, even if it may give relief in the short-term for people who start feeling overwhelmed. It'd be a temporary escape that discourages growth.

Well regarding question 1 and all of that i literally say "hi" to all my friends who are online but most of the times i get ghosted so it kinda depends, i have like +20 convertations for the people who didnt ghosted me so its pretty cool, i mean if i add them it means that i want to talk to them not for filling the space :9 Getting a limit to chat with somebody its very restrictive because there are good girl-boy friendships and putting a stop for them to chat from my point of view it doesnt make sense there is the block button so they can block the guys spamming their chat, the only thing i would do is to socialize the idea of "blocking the person" but the limit would work good on the guys you mention , everyone (especially the girls) in the site knows who they are so...