debate

But then again that's an evil batman the og is still considered a super hero and not an anti hero since he hasn't killed which is the essence of a super hero no super hero kills it doesn't mean its right but it doesn't make him a bad super hero

Superman does kill. Lambus brought up a good point. Superman snapped Zod's neck. In the defense of the innocent. A killing is justified. That is exactly what Superman did. Under Batman's no kill ethics. Batman would let Zod kill those civilians. If Batman can't kill Zod. Batman failed at saving those civilians. Failing at saving civilians makes a bad hero. Which makes Batman a bad hero. https://thumbs.gfycat.com/HarmfulLastingAfricancivet-size_restricted.gif

And batman killed Darkseid if you scroll up you'll see I put the comic where batman shoots darkseid with a bullet he created toxic to darkseid

I mean i already listed people batman has killed he would prefer not to kill but even he knows sometimes he has to morals guide your decisions but it doesn't mean you'll always follow them shown by the people batman has killed

If Batman sometimes doesn't follow his morals and sometimes kills. Then by your own standards. Batman is not a hero, but an anti hero.

Well by that logic so is superman, green lantern when he goes rogue, the Flash when he causes the downfall of a whole timeline because of his stupidity, super heroes aren't effective they kill on the rarest occasions they would be considered anti heroes if killing was all they did but it isn't most of them stick to their guns and rarely kill I said it before but it isn't really that simple in comics they try to humanize the heroes and much as they can causing them to sometimes step out of line only to return back to being a hero sure batman has killed but he didn't stay in that zone he went back to his morals right after just like many heroes have done

Green lantern started as a hero turned anti hero and back to hero same as how batman has gone anti hero before but returned to a hero