debate

so you know this argument makes no actual sense right? lemme turn this against you you, a cannibal: bro your whole not eating human flesh thing really breaks down under harsh conditions me, not a cannibal: how so you, a cannibal: well if you ever got in a plane accident and you would have to eat the survivors to live like, its just not realistic so its not an argument against veganism xD

the infection rate is pretty high if you canibal meat straight up..so it is better to chop it up and boil it in a soup...

nah, some indigenous tribes have built an immunity to the negative effects of cannibalism but that's beside the point xD.....

i dont see how that breaks this.. "oki so bottomline is...basically prioritise the survival of your own species..and when that is not affected you can try being alittle kind to others" that example just shows how that statement is not equal to veganism..thats all

no the cannibalism breaks the "but if you had nothing else to eat" argument the "do as little harm as reasonably possible" is the vegansim slogan

well that comes down to bearing the food depriviation symptoms as long as possible and then hunting the weakest to prolong the survival of the species

wait, can you rephrase that? i dont really understand your above statements

plan you meals out ( the only important thing in that post)...basically feeding the weakest..surviving...till the symptoms show...and repeat process