debate

shit just contradicts...it basically puts human survival as priority..and when that is not in concern.."act kindly"..that is just a facade

i kinda get what your saying because tier lists of life value starts to form as i said previously in this thread, a scientists life in societies eyes will always hold more value then a homeless persons but that doesn't mean we just kill homeless people (everything but....) because we still respect a sentient beings will to live just as i hold humans higher then animals, i still don't want to see animals harmed needlessly

by conditional respect do you mean culture or social contract? i mean yeah, but this is getting political xD (also a very anti-capitalist way of thinking~ getting a lil bolshevik in here ;3)

oki so bottomline is...basically prioritise the survival of your own species..and when that is not affected you can try being alittle kind to others

what conditions xD? iv stayed logically consistant this entire time my dude please refresh my memory on where veganism "broke down"

conditions where you dont really find starchy vegetables of grains...so basically you prioritise survival and kill an animal