Do Not Enter

@momoichi "no this is relevant my assertion is that its heroic to try and stop an active shooter to help prevent further deaths do you disagree?" No, it's absolutely not relevant because the terms of engagement were entirely different. To even begin to say they were the same circumstances is insane. In one instance, the shooter was actively taking more lives, the other, the shooter was fleeing towards police lines. Why do you keep ignoring this? Everyone knew where the police like was, he turned his back to those chasing him and ran. If he wanted to he could've gunned down every single fucking one of them during that persuit

Like i said protests fall on deaf ears rn. It gets heightened by the rising events and rioting this isnt the age where martin luther king had a dream. This is the 21st century where a single tweet can destroy someone's career. When you walk through the streets and yell "what do we want? "Change" when do we want it? "Now"" who is your audience? Cuz the news only reports riots and political beef. What do the congress see? Riots and political beef

@neotangs stop dodging the question in general do you think it is heroic to try and stop a mass shooter? "If he wanted to he could've gunned down every single fucking one of them during that persuit" so now pursuing an active shooter is illegal? is this the hill you wanna die on xD?

@hell_hound7 i asked what should they do instead and I'm still waiting on that answer and dont just say 'take it to congress', that could mean a million things i need you to tell me a comprehensive plan of actions for them to take that would get more done than protesting

I'm not dodging shit, that's an ungodly manipulative question. Both the examples you used for the same question were entirely different and the variables varied greatly

he thinks the question is loaded just because he knows in his heart stopping an active shooter is heroic, but he cant admit it because his argument falls apart he's being dishonest basically and my question uncovers that