debate

Whats funny is people think Im insulting them because I have no substantive argument and fill that void with insults. Truth is I did both, I used facts and logic - as well as insults. Case in point: yestotally - while it is true I insulted him I also used a lot of facts and logic. People cry ad hominem way too easily anymore. Im pretty sure all of those lengthy posts through the 60s pages are just substance lacking flame fests :).

im back baby still ready to debate anyone who disagrees with veganism on a moral and ethical level

vegetarian but i was vegan for 3 months and plan to go vegan again when i move out its a lot of fun for me to debate in veganism as it is a moral imperative to anyone who isnt a sociopath or hypocrite :3

well I do think veganism is good on a moral and ethical level... I just don't know if it's healthy cause you need supplements... well every diet dat needs supplements for me is not healthy. the only reason I don't like veganism

please dont reply to my debate proposal unless you want a proper debate, which im more then happy to have with anyone >w>/ again, debating is very fun for me >W> it is healthy and even carnists need to supplement to be perfectly healthy

untrue, the meat and dairy industry have gone down in year but ethically thats just appealing to futility if they packaged murdered humans who were caged, tortured, had their necks slit and hung to bleed while still alive, had their meat in the supermarket i might as well buy it because theyr already dead right? any dollar spent on meat is an incentive for that supermarket to keep purchasing the meat/dairy/egg product heres another way to put it a circus is going on where they abuse elephants but they have a killer trapeze act would you go the circus to see the act even if its promoting animal abuse? the elephant will still be hurt during the show whether you go or not, so why not right?