Political rants

@auntron_ fake news they mention neurology you gotta find something that says virology otherwise these guys wont accept it and come up with excuses.

Also, yes the India data could have been skewed by some other factor not specified. But the data regarding the introduction of ivermectin resulting in the plummeting of cases and deaths is pretty evident of its efficacy.

That is a good point actually, I’ll revise it haha (jk). Though realistically clinical trials are a basis of evidence in science of the efficacy of a treatment.

And the conclusion of that paper has a nice ring to it doesn’t it? “Meta-analyses based on 18 randomized controlled treatment trials of ivermectin in COVID-19 have found large, statistically significant reductions in mortality, time to clinical recovery, and time to viral clearance. Furthermore, results from numerous controlled prophylaxis trials report significantly reduced risks of contracting COVID-19 with the regular use of ivermectin. Finally, the many examples of ivermectin distribution campaigns leading to rapid population-wide decreases in morbidity and mortality indicate that an oral agent effective in all phases of COVID-19 has been identified.“ You just can’t refute it, it’s science, and it’s beautiful :). Randomized clinical trials are what scientists use to determine whether something is safe and effective. Oh and did I mention it’s peer reviewed? Meaning it’s accepted by the scientific community as fact? Yeah, ivermectin is an evident safe and effective treatment more reliable than the vaccine :3.

Go to 27 minutes in the video and you can see the doctor that published the peer reviewed research paper I linked talk about ivermectin. This was sometime in December 2020, since then NIH has listened to him, still it’s a pretty powerful speech. He has the data to back it up too as I’ve shown. Oh and he’s not anti-vax like they say in the title, he has nothing against the vaccine as I recall going through his organization’s website. https://youtu.be/MGboD4KAgbM

To be fair, their "peer reviewed" data either didnt address the issue at hand or the ones that did werent reviewed or done in a way that made it a valid experiment. I recall people asking them to revise their data. There is still something to be considered with it since it may prevent covid from crossing into cell nuclei and downregulating the immune system, but even if its true, it sounds like its only really useful if you're hospitalized.

I feel like i really should get into politics. Here i am in my free time thinking "what would i do as president? How would i handle divisive topics" and it hit me. Abortion. Abortion is a hot topic women wanting to be in control of a major life decision and religious people wanting pro-life. How do you find a common middle ground? Incentivizing birth. Like rather than outright make illegal or ignore the issue. Incentivize people giving birth. All these hypocrite religious people saying every life is precious, then take responsibility. Take a kid under your care or something. Set up maybe arranged adoptions. For any kids in danger of abortion compensate the mothers for giving birth and after delivery give the child to a family so they arent just thrown into the system. How would we afford this? Create an organization that is nonprofit and accepts donations. A sure fire way to make sure we get donations is by creating a system where instead of "taxing the rich" we get them to donate to these charities in exchange for a tax cut.

They already manipulate the system why not play it to our advantage. We can create nonprofits they can just donate to and use those avenues to better the community. Afterschool programs for kids, tutoring services, life skill workshops. Its brilliant.

Incentivizing birth is stupid. Let´s say you do the opposite, make incentevise abortion, big drama. I am not for or against having children, I think women should be able to make a choice without being put into any direction. People who want have children should have children and people who want an abortion should get it.

How is it stupid? The abortion option is still there but we are incentivizing hey if you give birth to this kid it will go to a home where itbhas a chance and you will be compensated sort of like a surrogate adoption.