Tournament of BOWER!!!
Mea_chan @a13x_6
commented on
Tournament of BOWER!!!
Mea_chan @a13x_6
its in shared files
Mea_chan @a13x_6
commented on
Tournament of BOWER!!!
Mea_chan @a13x_6
so there is still proof
Mea_chan @a13x_6
commented on
Tournament of BOWER!!!
Mea_chan @a13x_6
also, i have it open so i can provide screenshots
vinyl_retroflexed @vinyl_retroflexed
commented on
Tournament of BOWER!!!
vinyl_retroflexed @vinyl_retroflexed
"Whoever wins attacks the loser."
Nothing about a clash subduing a ULT.
Mea_chan @a13x_6
commented on
Tournament of BOWER!!!
Mea_chan @a13x_6
that's a special circumstance letting an ult go through. you said yourself we shouldn't have special circumstances
Mea_chan @a13x_6
commented on
Tournament of BOWER!!!
Mea_chan @a13x_6
if we can allow an ult to go through, then why allow the defending player a chance at attacking during a clash?
vinyl_retroflexed @vinyl_retroflexed
commented on
Tournament of BOWER!!!
vinyl_retroflexed @vinyl_retroflexed
Its either you take it, or leave it.
If you can find a actual line from the PDF.
That says "IF CLASHED WITH ULT, and hit the player still survives."
I like the rules documented.
If it ain't, then your objectively wrong.
You can't add rules, without implementing them in the PDF.
Mea_chan @a13x_6
commented on
Tournament of BOWER!!!
Mea_chan @a13x_6
the point is there is no line like that
vinyl_retroflexed @vinyl_retroflexed
commented on
Tournament of BOWER!!!
vinyl_retroflexed @vinyl_retroflexed
Well then, put them in the PDF.
Mea_chan @a13x_6
commented on
Tournament of BOWER!!!
Mea_chan @a13x_6
its completely unclear. we're arguing about something that should have been already decided upon
Please login to post.
