Whatcha doin?!?

Shane Dawson is cringe. The things he said (re: molesting his cat) wasn't even funny he was just going for shock value.

What do actual killings have to do with this? You didn't understand my arguments on petty subjective morality. What did I mean by petty subjective morality? It was in reference to jokes. I do not want your petty subjective morality inserted into jokes. What makes you the moral arbiter on what jokes are OK to tell and what jokes are not OK to tell? There are millions of opinions on what is morally OK jokes to tell and what are not morally OK jokes to tell. You then come along strolling on your high horse stating that this is not morally OK jokes. Why are your feelings more morally correct than everyone else? Everyone has different feelings. No ones feelings are the same. Feelings are entirely subjective. Thus, I reject the notion of feelings based morally arbitrated humor. You don't understand the difference between a joke and a real life action. There is a difference between a terrorist flying planes into a building and a person making jokes about Muslims flying planes into a building. Jokes and actual killings are mutually exclusive. Jokes about Muslims being terrorist are words that do not actually kill anyone. Killings by Muslims terrorist are actions far removed from jokes. Joke are words. Killing is an action. Do not conflate jokes and actual killings. They are not the same. You quickly fall into the slippery slope. You can't joke about race. Because in your own words "Words are powerful. What you say has an affect on people whether you like it or not." You can't joke about fat people. Because in your own words "Words are powerful. What you say has an affect on people whether you like it or not." You can't joke about gender and sex. Because in your own words "Words are powerful. What you say has an affect on people whether you like it or not." You can't joke about short people. Because in your own words "Words are powerful. What you say has an affect on people whether you like it or not." You can't joke about weebs. Because in your own words "Words are powerful. What you say has an affect on people whether you like it or not." You can't joke about incels. Because in your own words "Words are powerful. What you say has an affect on people whether you like it or not." You can't joke about bald people. Because in your own words "Words are powerful. What you say has an affect on people whether you like it or not." You can't joke about (fill in the blank). Because in your own words "Words are powerful. What you say has an affect on people whether you like it or not." This joke is OK. But that joke is not OK. Well, who's the moral arbiter on what jokes are OK? Why are your morally based feelings any more important than someone else? You may say that this and that joke is OK. You may say a very simple joke. But then someone that's a bigger snowflake than you comes along and states it is bullshit and shouldn't be said. Which like I said. It is feelings based morally arbitrated humor. You quickly fall down the slippery slope of feelings based morally arbitrated humor. @the_noctor I didn't even address all the nonsense that you posted.

BTW I like how you keep editing your post. I don't blame you. I'm giving you a good verbal whooping here. @the_noctor https://media0.giphy.com/media/3og0IGXP7YLFONzVaU/giphy.gif