Civil War Is Coming

historians actually use facts and cite sources as well and dont rely on anectdotes. here are some accompanying quotes to show you dont even practice what you preach "I choose the method of talking to people with different backgrounds (including right-wing) to form my opinion." this is basically admitting you get most of your information from unverified sources "However, theres a trend starting that right-wing politics are losing their popularity" funny, i didnt know the majority of the EU was right leaning. this is just a statement with nothing backing it up "Don't ask me to name sources, i remember the message of what i read, not the details." for someone who likes to pratter on about the method historians use to argue you forget one of the most important things, which is ensuring that the information you hold is accurate. information without sources are bullshit and they can be considered anectdotes "At one point i just thought like you, until i actually met people who work in these parties." who gives a damn who youve met? we dont know them so your experiences with them are just hearsay "But anyway the Spain example proves my point that sources contradict a lot. " you didnt list any sources of any kind at all, thus you have proved nothing. thats also the job of historians you know, to compare sources and verify their authenticity. in fact, 2 different pieces of information doesnt even mean they contradict each other i stand by my views and pronoun usage, grow some thicker skin and get over it. dismissing someones point of view because someone used the wrong word just shows you are more likely to dismiss things you dont like hearing