For skin or not?
xueli @xueli
commented on
For skin or not?
xueli @xueli
I mean in that they differ in like the organs being removed and that in male circumcision the main goal is to remove the foreskin and potentially the tissue connecting the foreskin but not actual amputation which is what typically happens in female circumcision where they remove not only the hood to the clitoris, but the entire clitoris itself as well as the vulva which is basically all the outer parts of the female genitalia. I believe the procedure is that they cut off the exterior tissues and sew it up, leaving a hole for urine and menstrual blood to pass. And also I don't think there's any push to clinically go about female circumcision so I think the vast majority of FGM is done the primitive way
akise_aru79 @akise_aru79
commented on
For skin or not?
akise_aru79 @akise_aru79
this will explain everything, I'm glad I'm not circumsized. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gCSWbTv3hng
HeroShinku @kosura
commented on
For skin or not?
HeroShinku @kosura
I actually find foreskin kind of cute ....
Still not gay ... just saying O.O
for some reason I have to repeat that because since I'm a guy other people automaticly think that liking dicks makes you gay ... I don't like guys so for as far as I know I'm still not gay .... O.O
aschthebloody @aschthebloody
commented on
For skin or not?
aschthebloody @aschthebloody
This account has been suspended.
r0BSCEÑ0 @robscene
commented on
For skin or not?
r0BSCEÑ0 @robscene
How much skin another man is packing between his legs interests me not
yaasshat @yaasshat
commented on
For skin or not?
yaasshat @yaasshat
Tis not the point.
r0BSCEÑ0 @robscene
commented on
For skin or not?
r0BSCEÑ0 @robscene
It's just my opinion. Young or old, consensual or not, that 1% of skin that people have/have not, and how they came to be that way, has no significant impact on my life (percentage completely fictional and unresearched). The one instance where it would hold any meaning is if I miraculously had a son of my own. In that case I'd be like, probably not. I don't know how that stuff works. Unless the mother was all for it, then I'd simply be saying: Yes, dear.
HeroShinku @kosura
commented on
For skin or not?
HeroShinku @kosura
aschthebloody .... I'm not sure in how far your son (if you will ever have a son) would thank you for that.
Since it packs no benefits and it absolutely has nothing to do with the jewish culture anymore (if you didn't know more and more jewish people are left not circumcised) ... if your son isn't a lifeless boy like the most that just follows the road that is drawn before them and one that thinks about everything he'll surely hate you .... hell if I would be your son you would probably be dead by the end of my 4th birthday O.O
Rinar @renard
commented on
For skin or not?
Rinar @renard
I don't care which is best but when I think about it, forced mutilation of a child without anesthesia is pretty sick.
Erranty @erranty
commented on
For skin or not?
Erranty @erranty
I was circumcised shortly after being born. Everything but the rim of my head just feels like a slightly more sensitive finger.
Yes I last dramatically longer because of it, sometimes too long, as in 2 hours of consecutive sex when I lost my virginity because I was using a normal sized condom instead of one more appropriate for my girth. (Make sure to check your size people and compare it to the manufacturer's recommendation, it makes a difference.)
Needless to say, I will not be allowing any children I ever have to be circumcised, and will aggressively sue any doctor that does it against my wishes.
Please login to post.