sam54

I can agree that Kyle didn't need to be there. Neither did Rosenbaum. My point is the view that Kyle is the focal point of scrutiny in a case that clearly had two bad actors. True Kyle is no hero and did get lucky. However the stance most make when they address that case is Kyle was completely in the wrong. Can I ask why you feel the need to shift complete blame onto Kyle? What good was Rosenbaum doing that deserves defending? It was my understanding the man was found carrying a handgun himself. What part of peaceful protesting says it's ok to terrorize a neighborhood in that manner. In the end the stance of saying "People like Kyle make (you) sick" or that it's Kyle that's supporting the fall of American society all while staying silent about Rosenbaum is alarming. Is a convicted pedophile worth more than a 17 year old taking a risk to protect another neighborhood from violent assault?

@momoichi @kuharido Hey guys. I was reading through some of your conversations on here and saw that y'all brought up Kyle Rittenhouse. One of you said that "people like Kyle made (you) sick." I assume that comment is based on a bias of politics or some misinformation presented to you as facts. I have heard popular media outlets gloss over details about what transpired in Wisconsin and the men involved. Many who support popular social justice groups have decided that the teenager Kyle who is only 18 years old and was 17 at the time of the shootings should face harsh criminal charges for taking the life of a "Servant of Social Change for Black Lives." Please consider reading up on the men who lied about fighting for Black rights and who have public government records that prove that Joseph Rosenbaum was a convicted child abuser. His public records can be found with the Arizona criminal records. If 32 year old Joseph isn't a man that makes you sick, but 17 year old Kyle is then maybe reassess those standards?