$(".comments_topic_51766 .more").remove(); $(".comments_topic_51766").prepend("
\n\n
\n
\'animekid\'<\/a><\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n
\n
\n ‍Animekid<\/span> @animekid<\/span><\/a><\/span>\n \n commented on\n <\/span>\n Political rants<\/a>\n <\/div>\n
\n
‍Animekid<\/span> @animekid<\/span><\/a><\/span><\/div>\n <\/div>\n Oct 16, 21 at 6:21pm<\/i>\n <\/div>\n\n
\n
So what's the general idea on the difference between defending someone/something etc and explaining that someone/something etc isn't inherently the way someone says/thinks it is? Is it a fine line difference? A big one? None at all?<\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n
\n <\/div>\n\n<\/div>
\n\n
\n
\'verucassault\'<\/a><\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n
\n
\n VerucAssault<\/span> @verucassault<\/span><\/a><\/span>\n \n commented on\n <\/span>\n Political rants<\/a>\n <\/div>\n
\n
VerucAssault<\/span> @verucassault<\/span><\/a><\/span><\/div>\n <\/div>\n Oct 16, 21 at 7:22pm<\/i>\n <\/div>\n\n
\n
@animekid\nCan you give an example? <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n
\n <\/div>\n\n<\/div>
\n\n
\n
\'projectotakux\'<\/a><\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n
\n
\n AspieChu<\/span> @projectotakux<\/span><\/a><\/span>\n \n commented on\n <\/span>\n Political rants<\/a>\n <\/div>\n
\n
AspieChu<\/span> @projectotakux<\/span><\/a><\/span><\/div>\n <\/div>\n Oct 16, 21 at 8:20pm<\/i>\n <\/div>\n\n
\n
@animekid you worded that so weirdly, I am confused as to what you are talking about.<\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n
\n <\/div>\n\n<\/div>
\n\n
\n
\'animekid\'<\/a><\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n
\n
\n ‍Animekid<\/span> @animekid<\/span><\/a><\/span>\n \n commented on\n <\/span>\n Political rants<\/a>\n <\/div>\n
\n
‍Animekid<\/span> @animekid<\/span><\/a><\/span><\/div>\n <\/div>\n Oct 16, 21 at 9:30pm<\/i>\n <\/div>\n\n
\n
@verucassault\n@projectotakux\n\nMy apologies, I'm told that I can be very bad with wording or explaining things at times.\n\nFor example let's say there's a content creator that regularly puts out new content. Someone(A) comes up and says that all the content is lazy and low budget and if they cared about their viewers they would make better content that wasn't so lazy. When someone(B) tries to point out how to content might not be the best but it also isn't exactly lazy content and they give a few reasons why it isn't exactly lazy content and it requires some work the other person(A) respond with something along the lines of saying "Just admit you're defending a lazy content creator and go".\n\nIs person (A) correct and are they defending a lazy content creator or are they explaining another possible point of view? In this example is it defending someone to point out that the person isn't exactly lazy or is it explaining that the person isn't completely right and that they could be wrong because they might not understand all the work that goes into it? \n\nIs defending and explaining the same thing or are they different? \n\nI hope that clears things up a little bit.<\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n