$(".comments_topic_50339 .more").remove(); $(".comments_topic_50339").prepend("
\n\n
\n
\'verucassault\'<\/a><\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n
\n
\n VerucAssault<\/span> @verucassault<\/span><\/a><\/span>\n \n commented on\n <\/span>\n 2020 US Presidential Election<\/a>\n <\/div>\n
\n
VerucAssault<\/span> @verucassault<\/span><\/a><\/span><\/div>\n <\/div>\n Nov 23, 20 at 3:58pm<\/i>\n <\/div>\n\n
\n
An unbiased judge would write like he went to law school for several years and learn to not pollute legal documents with disparaging remarks. \n\nThat is the only thing I am arguing. \n\nWhich by the way, you never gave me a yes or no answer. \n\nSo, since you are defending it, that's a "No, I do not think this legal document is biased," correct?\n\nWe now have a basis and standard for what you think is and is not biased for future reference. <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n
\n <\/div>\n\n<\/div>
\n\n
\n
\'hell_hound7\'<\/a><\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n
\n
\n Panda-kun™<\/span> @hell_hound7<\/span><\/a><\/span>\n \n commented on\n <\/span>\n 2020 US Presidential Election<\/a>\n <\/div>\n
\n
Panda-kun™<\/span> @hell_hound7<\/span><\/a><\/span><\/div>\n <\/div>\n Nov 23, 20 at 4:06pm<\/i>\n <\/div>\n\n
\n
What i wanna know is if you have signed affidavits with eye witnesses and employes what other evidence do you need? There are countless instances of votes being left out "by accident" and getting lost or double counted due to software issues and no one thinks anythingbis wrong with this? Are we being serious here? Put aside voter fraud, put aside election integrity....what in the actual hell seems normal about this? Human error has no room to exist. You think the military can afford "human error" dealing with missles or NASA afford "human error" when people are being blasted offf in a rocket? Why is this ok?<\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n
\n <\/div>\n\n<\/div>
\n\n
\n
\'verucassault\'<\/a><\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n
\n
\n VerucAssault<\/span> @verucassault<\/span><\/a><\/span>\n \n commented on\n <\/span>\n 2020 US Presidential Election<\/a>\n <\/div>\n
\n
VerucAssault<\/span> @verucassault<\/span><\/a><\/span><\/div>\n <\/div>\n Nov 23, 20 at 4:13pm<\/i>\n <\/div>\n\n
\n
Judicial Writing Manual, Second Edition\nI. Introduction\nJudicial opinions serve three functions. First, written opinions communicate a court’s conclusions and the reasons for them to the parties\nand their lawyers. Second, when published, opinions announce the\nlaw to judges, academics, other lawyers, and the interested public. Finally, the preparation of a written opinion imposes intellectual discipline on the author, requiring the judge to clarify his or her reasoning\nand assess the sufficiency of precedential support for it.\nThe opinion should fairly, clearly, and accurately state the significant facts and relevant rules of law and demonstrate by its analysis\nthe reasonableness of its conclusions. Misstating significant facts or\nauthorities is a mark of carelessness, and it undermines the opinion’s\nauthority and integrity. Unclear or ambiguous writing reflects the author’s lack of clear thinking and defeats the opinion’s purpose. \n...the manual is to stimulate judges to think\nas systematically about writing their opinions as they do about deciding their cases. ...\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n...\n\nPomposity and humor\nJudicial writing can be pompous. The judge must avoid pompous\nwriting in an opinion, such as arcane or florid language, use of the\nimperial “we” (by a single district judge), or expressions of irrelevant\nerudition. Although the use of humor is sometimes rationalized as an\nantidote to pomposity, it works better in after-dinner speeches than\nin judicial opinions. In the latter, it may strike the litigants—who are\nnot likely to see anything funny in the litigation—as a sign of judicial arrogance and lack of sensitivity. Although some judges seem to\nhave succeeded in using humor in their opinions, it is a risk not to be\ntaken lightly. Nor need it be taken at all, for writing can be made lively,\nforceful, and interesting by its clarity and logic. \n...\nhttps://www.law.upenn.edu/live/files/5466-writing-judicial-opinions\n\n^sum more stuff I was reading re legal writing<\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n